Complicit Suffering and the Duty to Self-Care

Philosophy 93 (2):251-277 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Moral questions surrounding suffering tend to focus on obligations to relieve others’ suffering. In this paper, I focus on the overlooked question of what sufferers morally owe to themselves, arguing that they have the duty to self-care. I discuss agents who have been shaped by moral luck to contribute to their own suffering and canvass the ways in which this damages their moral agency. I contend that these agents have a duty to care for themselves by protecting and expanding their agency, which involves precluding further destruction of agency and ensuring the continued ability to self-care.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-04-22

Downloads
85 (#245,957)

6 months
11 (#338,628)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alycia LaGuardia
University of Connecticut

Citations of this work

On why the poor have duties too.Ashwini Vasanthakumar - 2023 - Ethics and Global Politics 16 (2):8-16.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Obligation to Resist Oppression.Carol Hay - 2011 - Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (1):21-45.
Servility and self-respect.Thomas E. Hill - 1973 - The Monist 57 (1):87 - 104.
Selflessness and the loss of self.Jean Hampton - 1993 - Social Philosophy and Policy 10 (1):135-65.

View all 14 references / Add more references