Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation

&
Ethics and the Environment 4 (1):115-121 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

1999, 2020

ISBN(s)

9780415131131   9781003060000   9781138987982

DOI

10.4324/9781003060000

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,836

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation. Hugh LaFollette, Niall Shanks.Scott Devito - 1998 - Isis 89 (1):169-170.
Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation.Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks - 1996 - Routledge.
Review of Hugh LaFollette and Niall Shanks Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation. [REVIEW]Keith Jackson - 1999 - Ethics and the Environment 4:115-122.
Hugh LaFollette and Niall Shanks, Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation.Joseph Mahon - 1999 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 7 (1):130-131.
Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation (review).Keith Burgess-Jackson - 1999 - Ethics and the Environment 4 (1):115-121.
Review. Brute science: dilemmas of animal experimentation. Hugh LaFollette, Niall Shanks.Mark Parascandola - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (4):621-624.
Hugh LaFollette and Niall Shanks, Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation:Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation.David Benatar - 1999 - Ethics 110 (1):207-211.
Worries about Animal Models in Biomedical Research a Response to Lafollette and Shanks.Lynn R. Willis & Martin G. Hulsey - 1994 - Public Affairs Quarterly 8 (2):205-218.
Review of "Animal Models in the Light of Evolution" by Niall Shanks, Ph.D., and C. Ray Greek, M.D. [REVIEW]Lewis Wolpert - 2010 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 5:12.
Hugh LaFollette, ed., The Oxford Handbook to Practical Ethics. [REVIEW]Roger Shiner - 2005 - Philosophy in Review 25:116-120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-19

Downloads
30 (#817,070)

6 months
6 (#695,703)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Hugh LaFollette
University of South Florida

Citations of this work

Model Organisms are Not (Theoretical) Models.Arnon Levy & Adrian Currie - 2015 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 66 (2):327-348.
Against external validity.Julian Reiss - 2019 - Synthese 196 (8):3103-3121.
Are animal models predictive for humans?Niall Shanks, Ray Greek & Jean Greek - 2009 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 4:2.

View all 36 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references