Art across Cultures and Art by Appropriation

Journal of Aesthetic Education 54 (2):1-20 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Perceptually indistinguishable artifacts may be artworks in some cultures but not be artworks in others, and artifacts that were not artworks in the context of their original creation can become artworks in contexts of appropriation, that is, in contexts in which they are brought under a cross-culturally appropriate concept or definition of art. A certain background of historical and cultural conditions, some of them theoretical, is necessary for something to be or to become an artwork. It is crucial to my central claims in what follows that artworks embody culturally significant meanings or can acquire such meanings over time. This plays an essential role in answering the question of whether something is an...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-14

Downloads
47 (#468,638)

6 months
9 (#482,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Artworld.Arthur Danto - 1964 - Journal of Philosophy 61 (19):571-584.
The role of theory in aesthetics.Morris Weitz - 1956 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 15 (1):27-35.
Extending art historically.Jerrold Levinson - 1993 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51 (3):411-423.
Nobody Needs a Theory of Art.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy 105 (3):109-127.
Appropriation and Authorship in Contemporary Art.Sherri Irvin - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (2):123-137.

View all 9 references / Add more references