Abstract

Islamization of knowledge (islāmiyyat or aslamat al-ma‘rifah) has emerged as one of the most significant Muslim global intellectual enterprises over the past half-century. Its efforts to integrate Islamic epistemology with Western knowledge systems have, however, subjected it to extensive criticism, a subset of which dismisses it as an ideological programme aimed at reviving religion, defying secularism, and subverting Western universal values. This article focuses on this subset of criticism and analyses its discourse by framing it within the broader context of the “Muslim Question.” Reminiscent of the historical Jewish question, the “Muslim Question” continues to serve as a lens through which Islam and Muslims are systematically constructed as a problem. To dissect and retrace the inherent structure shared by the “Muslim Question” and this criticism, this study provides a discursive analysis of the criticism of the Islamization of knowledge revisiting the decades-long critique of Bassam Tibi. Then it contextualizes this criticism within the broader narrative of crisis; however, distinguishing it from European rhetoric of the crisis of Islam and probes its conflation at the intersection of reasonable critique and Islamophobia. The article concludes that a serious study of the Islamization of knowledge and its most recent facet, knowledge integration (al-takāmul al-ma‘rifī), should acknowledge the plurality and diversity within Muslim intellectual traditions and resist homogenizing them under reductive categories. Such a merited study will have the potential to promote a more balanced and inclusive engagement with the intricate realities of contemporary Muslim thought and practice.