Why We Still Need a Substantive Determination of Death

American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):55-57 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In their target article, Nielsen Busch and Mjaaland (2023) exhort us to stop “focus[ing] on the validity of the criteria for determination of [circulatory] death” and “instead [look at] DCD protoco...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cerebral Circulatory Arrest and the Dead Donor Rule.Christos Lazaridis - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):43-45.
Death Lost in Translation.Daniel P. Sulmasy & Anne L. Dalle Ave - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):17-19.
The Dead Donor Rule Does Require that the Donor is Dead.Lainie Ross - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (2):12-14.
Restoring the Organism as a Whole: Does NRP Resurrect the Dead?Emil J. N. Busch - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (6):27-33.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-23

Downloads
23 (#928,602)

6 months
4 (#1,232,162)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Karola Kreitmair
University of Wisconsin, Madison

References found in this work

Are DCD Donors Dead?Don Marquis - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (3):24-31.
Why DCD Donors Are Dead.John P. Lizza - 2020 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45 (1):42-60.
A Defense of the Dead Donor Rule.David Magnus - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (S4):36-38.

Add more references