- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A Functionalist Analysis of Game Acts: Revisiting Searle
Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 28 (2):160-172 (2001)
Abstract
No abstractOther Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Practical Philosophy of Sport by R. Scott Kretchmar.Jim Parry - 1995 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 22 (1):108-110.
Practical Philosophy of Sport and Physical Activity, 2nd ed. By R. Scott Kretchmar. Published 2005 by Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL. [REVIEW]Alun R. Hardman - 2007 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 34 (1):97-99.
Too Much Playing Games – A Response to Kretchmar.Alex Wolf-Root - 2020 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 14 (2):264-268.
What counts as part of a game? Reconsidering skills.Cesar R. Torres - 2018 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 45 (1):1-21.
On the Contingent Relation Between Motor Actions and Sport: A Reaction to Kretchmar.Jan W. I. Tamboer - 1993 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 20 (1):82-90.
An Interview with John R. Searle.Paolo Di Lucia & Edoardo Fittipaldi - 2021 - In Paolo Di Lucia & Edoardo Fittipaldi (eds.), Revisiting Searle on Deriving “Ought” From “Is”. Springer Verlag. pp. 17-29.
Tamboer, Kretchmar, and Loland: Sacred Texts for an Unholy Critique.Robert G. Osterhoudt - 1993 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 20 (1):91-101.
Speech acts, meaning, and intentions: critical approaches to the philosophy of John R. Searle.Armin Burkhardt (ed.) - 1990 - New York: W. de Gruyter.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-24
Downloads
27 (#829,749)
6 months
10 (#418,198)
2013-11-24
Downloads
27 (#829,749)
6 months
10 (#418,198)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
How to Understand Rule-Constituted Kinds.Manuel García-Carpintero - 2021 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 13 (1):7-27.
Game-Playing Without Rule-Following.A. J. Kreider - 2011 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 38 (1):55-73.
Rules in games and sports: why a solution to the problem of penalties leads to the rejection of formalism as a useful theory about the nature of sport.Sinclair A. MacRae - 2020 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 47 (1):49-62.
Understanding the background conditions of skilled movement in sport: A study of Searle's 'background capacities'.Vegard Fusche Moe - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (3):299 – 324.
Rules in games and sports: why a solution to the problem of penalties leads to the rejection of formalism as a useful theory about the nature of sport.Sinclair A. MacRae - 2019 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 47 (1):49-62.
References found in this work
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.John Rogers Searle - 1969 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Tricky Triad: Games, Play, and Sport.Bernard Suits - 1988 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 15 (1):1-9.
Are Rules All an Umpire Has to Work With?J. S. Russell - 1999 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 26 (1):27-49.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-82spv uwo