Is There a Single Right Interpretation?

Pennsylvania State University Press (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is there a single right interpretation for such cultural phenomena as works of literature, visual artworks, works of music, the self, and legal and sacred texts? In these essays, almost all written especially for this volume, twenty leading philosophers pursue different answers to this question by examining the nature of interpretation and its objects and ideals. The fundamental conflict between positions that universally require the ideal of a single admissible interpretation and those that allow a multiplicity of some admissible interpretations leads to a host of engrossing questions explored in these essays: Does multiplism invite interpretive anarchy? Can opposing interpretations be jointly defended? Should competition between contending interpretations be understood in terms of truth or reasonableness, appropriateness, aptness, or the like? Is interpretation itself an essentially contested concept? Does interpretive activity seek truth or aim at something else as well? Should one focus on interpretive acts rather than interpretations? Should admissible interpretations be fixed by locating intentions of a historical or hypothetical creator, or neither? What bearing does the fact of the historical situatedness of cultural entities have on their identities? The contributors are Annette Barnes, Noël Carroll, Stephen Davies, Susan Feagin, Alan Goldman, Charles Guignon, Chhanda Gupta, Garry Hagberg, Michael Krausz, Peter Lamarque, Jerrold Levinson, Joseph Margolis, Rex Martin, Jitendra Mohanty, David Novitz, Philip Percival, Torsten Pettersson, Robert Stecker, Laurent Stern, and Paul Thom

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Chapters

Similar books and articles

Is There a Single Right Interpretation?Michael Krausz - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (2):200-202.
Is there a single right interpretation?Colin Lyas - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (3):338-340.
Is There a Single Right Interpretation? [REVIEW]Thora Ilin Bayer - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (3):462-464.
Limits of Rightness.Michael Krausz - 2000 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
5 Are There Definitive Interpretations.Laurent Stern - 2002 - In Michael Krausz, Is There a Single Right Interpretation? Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 76-98.
Objects of Interpretation.Peter Lamarque - 2000 - Metaphilosophy 31 (1-2):96-124.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-09

Downloads
27 (#878,166)

6 months
5 (#752,882)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references