Contemporary History of Cosmology and the Controversy over the Multiverse

Annals of Science 66 (4):529-551 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Summary Cosmology has always been different from other areas of the natural sciences. Although an observationally supported standard model of the universe emerged in the 1960s, more speculative models and conceptions continued to attract attention. During the last decade, ideas of multiple universes (the ‘multiverse’) based on anthropic reasoning have become very popular among cosmologists and theoretical physicists. This had led to a major debate within the scientific community of the epistemic standards of modern cosmology. Is the multiverse a scientific hypothesis, or is it rather a philosophical speculation disguised as science? This paper offers a review of the recent and still ongoing controversy concerning the multiverse, emphasizing its foundational nature and relation to philosophical issues. It also compares the multiverse controversy to some earlier episodes in the history of twentieth-century cosmology when particular theories and approaches came under attack for betraying the ideals of proper science.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,302

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Testability and epistemic shifts in modern cosmology.Helge Kragh - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46:48-56.
Predictability crisis in early universe cosmology.Chris Smeenk - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46 (PA):122-133.
Revisiting the Scientific Nature of Multiverse Theories.Man Ho Chan - 2023 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 55 (1):137-151.
Beyond Falsifiability: Normal Science in a Multiverse.Sean M. Carroll - 2019 - In Dawid Richard, Dardashti Radin & Thebault Karim, Epistemology of Fundamental Physics: Why Trust a Theory? Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-22

Downloads
166 (#144,694)

6 months
7 (#469,699)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics.Lev Vaidman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Beyond Falsifiability: Normal Science in a Multiverse.Sean M. Carroll - 2019 - In Dawid Richard, Dardashti Radin & Thebault Karim, Epistemology of Fundamental Physics: Why Trust a Theory? Cambridge University Press.
Testability and epistemic shifts in modern cosmology.Helge Kragh - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46:48-56.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Falsificationism falsified.Sven Ove Hansson - 2006 - Foundations of Science 11 (3):275-286.
Falsification and Demarcation in Astronomy and Cosmology.Benjamin Sovacool - 2005 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 25 (1):53-62.
Anthropic reasoning.Martin J. Rees - 1997 - Complexity 3 (1):17-21.
Explaining the universe.Martin Rees - 2004 - In John Cornwell, Explanations: styles of explanation in science. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 39--66.

View all 6 references / Add more references