- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Galileo and the scientific revolution of the seventeenth century
Philosophical Review 52 (4):333-348 (1943)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Was the scientific revolution really a revolution in science?Gary Hatfield - 1996 - In Jamil Ragep & Sally Ragep (eds.), Tradition, Transmission, Transformation: Proceedings of Two Conferences on Pre-Modern Science Held at the University of Oklahoma. Brill. pp. 489–525.
Essay Review: Multiple Perspectives: The Seventeenth Century Scientific Revolution Then and Now: Reason, Experiment, and Mysticism in the Scientific Revolution.B. J. T. Dobbs - 1977 - History of Science 15 (4):273-286.
Metaphysics and the new science.Gary Hatfield - 1990 - In David C. Lindberg & Robert S. Westman (eds.), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, ed. by and (Cambridge:). Cambridge University Press. pp. 93–166.
The Rise of Modern Science: When and Why?R. Hooykaas - 1987 - British Journal for the History of Science 20 (4):453-473.
The dark side of the Scientific Revolution. The Biblical interpretation in Galileo Galilei and Isaac Newton.Francesco Fiorentino - 2015 - Dialogo 2 (1):141-157.
Expectation and Assent in Seventeenth-Century Scientific Argument Galileo and Others.A. C. Crombie & Flaminia Ricora - 1992 - Istituto Antonio Banfi.
The Copernican Revolution and the Galileo Affair.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2012 - In J. B. Stump & Alan G. Padgett (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Science and Christianity. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 14-25.
The enigma of the inclined plane from Heron to Galileo.Sophie Roux & Egidio Festa - 2008 - In Walter Roy Laird & Sophie Roux (eds.), Mechanics and natural philosophy before the scientific revolution. London: Springer. pp. 195-222.
Jesuit Science and the Republic of Letters by Mordechai Feingold (ed.). [REVIEW]Louis Caruana - 2005 - Gregorianum 86 (3):703-704.
Rinascimento, rivoluzione scientifica e libertinismo erudito.Carlo Borghero - 2019 - Noctua 6 (1–2):182-218.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
466 (#59,908)
6 months
18 (#156,046)
2009-01-28
Downloads
466 (#59,908)
6 months
18 (#156,046)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
(Mis)Understanding scientific disagreement: Success versus pursuit-worthiness in theory choice.Eli I. Lichtenstein - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 85:166-175.
Autonoesis and the Galilean science of memory: Explanation, idealization, and the role of crucial data.Nikola Andonovski - 2023 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13 (3):1-42.
Animism and Natural Teleology from Avicenna to Boyle.Jeff Kochan - 2021 - Science in Context 34 (1):1-23.
The Aristotelian Tradition and the Rise of British Empiricism: Logic and Epistemology in the British Isles.Marco Sgarbi - 2012 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.
Circles of Scientific Practice: Regressus, Mathēsis, Denkstil.Jeff Kochan - 2015 - In Dimitri Ginev (ed.), Critical Science Studies after Ludwik Fleck. St. Kliment Ohridski University Press. pp. 83-99.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-t7p9b uwo