Medical ethics: who decides what?

Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (2):105-108 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The FME symposium on teaching medical ethics takes up the issue of competence and responsibility in matters concerning bioethics (1). Foreseeably, the medical participants argue that physicians are prepared, or can be easily prepared, to handle all relevant aspects of medical ethics. The contrary position is sustained by the philosophically trained participants, who believe that physicians do not, in fact cannot, sufficiently manage medico-ethical problems. This paper sees a role for both parties. Medical ethicists should properly be involved in medical education and in analytical and systematic study of medical ethics. They should not generally be involved in clinical medico-moral decision-making, which is properly the realm of patient and (ethically competent) doctor

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
22 (#971,181)

6 months
9 (#482,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Miguel Kottow
Universidad de Chile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What is diagnosis? Some critical reflections.Caroline Whitbeck - 1981 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 2 (3):319-329.
The scientific autonomy of clinical medicine.Lee A. Forstrom - 1977 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2 (1):8-19.
A philosophy of a clinically based medical ethics.D. C. Thomasma - 1980 - Journal of Medical Ethics 6 (4):190-196.
In defence of clinical bioethics.J. D. Arras & T. H. Murray - 1982 - Journal of Medical Ethics 8 (3):122-127.

View all 8 references / Add more references