- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
What structural priming can and cannot reveal
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40 (2017)
Abstract
The nature of mental representations of linguistic expressions in relation to the time course from intention to articulation is a major issue. We discuss Branigan & Pickering's proposal to use structural priming to tap into this process. We show that their interpretation of their findings cannot be maintained. We reinterpret these results and suggest a revision of their conclusions.Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Structural priming is a useful but imperfect technique for studying all linguistic representations, including those of pragmatics.Alice Rees & Lewis Bott - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Structural priming and the representation of language.Holly P. Branigan & Martin J. Pickering - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40:e313.
Priming methods in semantics and pragmatics.Mora Maldonado, Benjamin Spector & Emmanuel Chemla - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
The limitations of structural priming are not the limits of linguistic theory.David Adger - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Considering experimental and observational evidence of priming together, syntax doesn't look so autonomous.Nicholas A. Lester, John W. Du Bois, Stefan Th Gries & Fermín Moscoso del Prado Martín - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
An experimental approach to linguistic representation.Holly P. Branigan & Martin J. Pickering - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40:e282.
Converging on a theory of language through multiple methods.Mónica González-Márquez, Michele I. Feist & Liane Ströbel - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Structural priming is not a Royal Road to representations.Antje S. Meyer - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Structural priming is most useful when the conclusions are statistically robust.Kyle Mahowald, Ariel James, Richard Futrell & Edward Gibson - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
On the nature of structure in structural priming.Nayoung Kwon & Yoonhyoung Lee - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-11-18
Downloads
22 (#972,197)
6 months
8 (#583,676)
2017-11-18
Downloads
22 (#972,197)
6 months
8 (#583,676)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
MEG Evidence for Incremental Sentence Composition in the Anterior Temporal Lobe.Jonathan R. Brennan & Liina Pylkkänen - 2017 - Cognitive Science 41 (S6):1515-1531.
Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. [REVIEW]Norbert Hornstein - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (4):567-573.
The time course of argument reactivation revealed: Using the visual world paradigm.Loes Koring, Pim Mak & Eric Reuland - 2012 - Cognition 123 (3):361-379.
On the Shallow Processing (Dis)Advantage: Grammar and Economy.Arnout Koornneef & Eric Reuland - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-zvk2b uwo