Towards a field theory of behaviour

Acta Biotheoretica 42 (4):281-293 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Classical ethology, with its emphasis on separability of parts, has largely failed to do justice to the wholeness of the individual animal, to the integrity of group behaviour and to the continuity between observable behaviour and consciousness. Field theory has potentialities to do better, as illustrated in this paper with reference to morphogenetic and behavioural fields. A behavioural domain is delineated — playlike behaviour — where field theory is particularly relevant. It is shown that the concept of symmetry can suggest new questions as well as explain some generally known phenomena of group behaviour. New interpretations of displacement activities and of etho-ecological adaptations are offered, both of which involve the whole individual animal.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#568,940)

6 months
12 (#277,938)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Wholeness and the Implicate Order.David Bohm - 1980 - New York: Routledge.
Wholeness and the Implicate Order.David Bohm - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (3):303-305.
Order out of Chaos.Ilya Prigogine & Isabelle Stengers - 1985 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (3):352-354.
Self-organized criticality.P. Bak & K. Chen - 1991 - Scientific American 264 (1):46–53.
On ethology and human behaviour.K. Kortmulder - 1974 - Acta Biotheoretica 23 (2):55-78.

View all 9 references / Add more references