- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
“Sorry, but the Ethicist Said Your Life Isn’t Actually Worth Living”: Misunderstanding Ethics and the Role of the Ethics Consultant
American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):24-27 (2023)
Abstract
In their target article, Childress et al. (2023) contemplate the ethical considerations associated with determining if and when life-sustaining interventions (in this case, ECMO) can be unilaterall...Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Battle of the Bridge: Ethical Considerations Related to Withdrawal of ECMO Support for Pediatric Patients over Family Objections.Jenny Kingsley, Emily R. Berkman & Sabrina F. Derrington - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):32-35.
Ethical Issues in the Transition to ECMO as a Destination Therapy.Samuel N. Doernberg, Derek R. Soled & Robert D. Truog - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):18-20.
The Divergence of Technical and Human Teleology.Roxanne E. Kirsch - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):38-41.
The Moral Relevance of ECMO Bridge Maintenance.Andrew M. Courtwright - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):52-54.
When the Bridge Crumbles: Balancing ECMO-DT With Transplant Program Needs.Paul J. Hutchison, Neeraj Joshi & Katherine Wasson - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):49-51.
The Human and Humanity that Differentiate Withholding from Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Therapy: An ECMO Bridge to Nowhere.Jonah Rubin, Ellen Robinson & Emily B. Rubin - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):62-64.
Why Deny ECMO-DT to the Incapacitated?Kyle E. Karches - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):70-72.
Fairly Distributing the Distributive Justice Argument Permits Stopping ECMO.Erica Andrist - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):65-67.
Ethical Withdrawal of ECMO Support Over the Objections of Competent Patients.Dominic Wilkinson, John Fraser, Jacky Suen, Mioko Kasagi Suzuki & Julian Savulescu - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):27-30.
ECMO: What Would a Deliberative Public Judge?Leonard Michael Fleck - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):46-48.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-05-25
Downloads
25 (#884,952)
6 months
5 (#1,053,842)
2023-05-25
Downloads
25 (#884,952)
6 months
5 (#1,053,842)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
References found in this work
Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach.Martha C. Nussbaum - 2011 - Harvard University Press.
What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal questions. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 435 - 450.
From Bridge to Destination? Ethical Considerations Related to Withdrawal of ECMO Support over the Objections of Capacitated Patients.Andrew Childress, Trevor Bibler, Bryanna Moore, Ryan H. Nelson, Joelle Robertson-Preidler, Olivia Schuman & Janet Malek - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):5-17.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-648784bb4d-82spv uwo