Říká logicismus něco, co se říkat nemá?

Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 32 (1):37-57 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to analyze the broader significance of Frege’s logicist project against the background of Wittgenstein’s philosophy from both Tractatus and Philosophical Investigations. The article draws on two basic observations, namely that Frege’s project aims at saying something that was only implicit in everyday arithmetical practice, as the so-called recursion theorem demonstrates, and that the explicitness involved in logicism does not concern the arithmetical operations themselves, but rather the way they are defined. It thus represents the attempt to make explicit not the rules alone, but rather the rules governing their following, i.e. rules of second-order type. I elaborate on these remarks with short references to Brandom’s refinement of Frege’s expressivist and Wittgenstein’s pragmatist project.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-04-11

Downloads
312 (#88,963)

6 months
95 (#65,005)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What The Tortoise Said To Achilles.Lewis Carroll - 1895 - Mind 104 (416):691-693.
Ueber Begriff und Gegenstand.Gottlob Frege - 1892 - Vierteljahrsschrift Für Wissenschaftliche Philosophie 16 (2):192-205.
Motivating inferentialism: Comments on M aking It Explicit.John McDowell - 2005 - Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):121-140.
Responses.Robert Brandom - 2008 - Philosophical Topics 36 (2):135-155.

View all 6 references / Add more references