- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Empirical Bioethics Research Is a Winner, But Bioethics Mission Creep Is a False Alarm
Journal of Clinical Ethics 25 (3):189-193 (2014)
Abstract
While we do not share Evans’s view that social science research is needed to shield bioethics from competitive threat, we incorporate and engage in social science research to inform our knowledge base, our clinical practice, and our contributions to the ongoing development of the field.Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Does empirical research make bioethics more relevant? “The embedded researcher” as a methodological approach.Stella Reiter-Theil - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1):17-29.
Empirical research in clinical ethics: The ‘committed researcher’ approach.Véronique Fournier, Sandrine Bretonnière & Marta Spranzi - 2020 - Bioethics 34 (7):719-726.
Responsible research and innovation: A manifesto for empirical ethics?John Gardner & Clare Williams - 2015 - Clinical Ethics 10 (1-2):5-12.
A plea for pragmatism in clinical research ethics.David H. Brendel & Franklin G. Miller - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (4):24 – 31.
A View From the Borderlands of Philosophical Bioethics and Empirical Social Science Research: How the 'Is' Can Inform the 'Ought'.Catherine Myser - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6-7):88-91.
Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: towards a consensus.Jonathan Ives, Michael Dunn, Bert Molewijk, Jan Schildmann, Kristine Bærøe, Lucy Frith, Richard Huxtable, Elleke Landeweer, Marcel Mertz, Veerle Provoost, Annette Rid, Sabine Salloch, Mark Sheehan, Daniel Strech, Martine de Vries & Guy Widdershoven - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):68.
Back to Basics: Re-embracing the Foundations of Clinical Ethics in Healthcare.Daniel Wyzynski - 2024 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 7 (1):26.
Setting standards for empirical bioethics research: a response to Carter and Cribb.Michael Dunn, Jonathan Ives, Bert Molewijk & Jan Schildmann - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):66.
Clinical research: Should patients pay to play?Ezekiel J. Emanuel, Steven Joffe, Christine Grady, David Wendler & Govind Persad - 2015 - Science Translational Medicine 7 (298):298ps16.
Paternalism and fairness in clinical research.Lynn A. Jansen & Steven Wall - 2008 - Bioethics 23 (3):172-182.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-14
Downloads
14 (#1,321,670)
6 months
3 (#1,061,821)
2023-06-14
Downloads
14 (#1,321,670)
6 months
3 (#1,061,821)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Ethical issues surrounding the provider initiated opt – Out prenatal HIV screening practice in Sub – Saharan Africa: a literature review.Luchuo Engelbert Bain, Kris Dierickx & Kristien Hens - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):1-12.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-9qhf6 uwo