Negotiating “The Social” and Managing Tuberculosis in Georgia

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (1):47-55 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I utilize anthropological insights to illuminate how health professionals and patients navigate and negotiate what for them is social about tuberculosis in order to improve treatment outcomes and support patients as human beings. I draw on ethnographic research about the implementation of the DOTS approach in Georgia’s National Tuberculosis Program in the wake of the Soviet healthcare system. Georgia is a particularly unique context for exploring these issues given the country’s rich history of medical professionalism and the insistence that the practice of medicine is a moral commitment to society. I argue for critical attention to the ways in which treatment recipients and providers navigate what, for them, is “social” about therapeutic practices and their significance for avoiding biological and social reductionism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Climate, Medicine, and Peruvian Health Resorts.Mark Carey - 2014 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 39 (6):795-818.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-07

Downloads
32 (#703,717)

6 months
6 (#851,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to the Actor-Network Theory.Bruno Latour - 2005 - Oxford, England and New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Anthropology, dots and understanding tuberculosis control in nepal.Ian Harper - 2006 - Journal of Biosocial Science 38 (1):57-67.
Disease, Life, and Man. [REVIEW]Rudolf Virchow & Lelland J. Rather - 1959 - Philosophy of Science 26 (4):386-386.

Add more references