Generating References in Naturalistic Face‐to‐Face and Phone‐Mediated Dialog Settings

Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (4):796-818 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

During dialog, references are presented, accepted, and potentially reused. Two experiments were conducted to examine reuse in a naturalistic setting. In Experiment 1, where the participants interacted face to face, self-presented references and references accepted through verbatim repetition were reused more. Such biases persisted after the end of the interaction. In Experiment 2, where the participants interacted over the phone, reference reuse mainly depended on whether the participant could see the landmarks being referred to, although this bias seemed to be only transient. Consistent with the memory-based approach to dialog, these results shed light on how differences in accessibility in memory affect the unfolding of the interaction.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,546

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

In the same boat.Kerstin Fischer, Lars Christian Jensen & Nadine Zitzmann - 2021 - Interaction Studies 22 (3):488-515.
Individual differences in the detection, matching and memory of faces.Matthew Fysh - 2018 - Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 3 (20).
More than advice.Rosalyn M. Langedijk & Jaap Ham - 2021 - Interaction Studies 22 (3):396-415.
The face-to-face light detection paradigm.Laura A. Thompson, Daniel M. Malloy, John M. Cone & David L. Hendrickson - 2010 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 11 (2):336-348.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-20

Downloads
94 (#228,288)

6 months
6 (#737,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):169-190.
Definite Knowledge and Mutual Knowledge.Herbert H. Clark & Catherine R. Marshall - 1981 - In Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Webber & Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 10–63.
Why is conversation so easy?Simon Garrod & Martin J. Pickering - 2004 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (1):8-11.

View all 10 references / Add more references