In Defense of Aristotle's Notion of Eudaimonia as an Activity of Contemplation

Archeology and Anthropology Open Access 4 (5):664-70 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper addresses claims that Aristotle's notion of happiness is inconsistent given his expositions of happiness in Book I and Book X of NE. It argues that such claims are rooted in the erroneous conclusion that Aristotle defines happiness in Book I as living a "good life", and an unwarranted assumption that when Aristotle identifies happiness with contemplation, he has a professional philosopher in mind and contemplation as an activity one engages in leisurely and as a means of intellectual conditioning. It further argues that happiness as Aristotle understands it is a reward for cultivating virtuous character and though everyone has the capacity for it, only few will attain happiness since it requires exertion and effort and many are unwilling to prioritize such acquisition.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-04-19

Downloads
297 (#92,883)

6 months
118 (#47,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Atina Knowles
Rutgers - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references