Kantianism and Thomistic Personalism on the Human Person: Self-Legislator or Self-Determiner?

Studia Gilsoniana 7 (3):437-451 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Inspired by a discussion about whether John Paul II grounded human dignity in a Kantian way, viz., emphasizing the person as an end unto itself, the author considers: (1) the relations between Kant and Aquinas on the topic of the philosophical basis of human dignity, and (2) John Paul II’s remarks on Kant’s ethics. He concludes that: (1) both Kant and Aquinas ground human dignity upon human freedom, but both understand the human freedom differently; (2) for Kant, human freedom is self-legislating and so exercised without rational direction; (3) the Thomistic notion of freedom is compatible with rational direction which consists, e.g., in the human understood as an intellector of being or as a willer of the good, though neither seem to be exploited by Wojtyla.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

John Paul II in the Light of Thomas Aquinas.Mary Christine Ugobi-Onyemere - 2017 - Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 29 (1-2):25-51.
Human Person and Freedom according to Karol Wojtyła.Rafal K. Wilk - 2007 - International Philosophical Quarterly 47 (3):265-278.
The Uniqueness of Persons.Linda Zagzebski - 2001 - Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (3):401 - 423.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-04

Downloads
32 (#706,224)

6 months
6 (#858,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Kant-Bibliographie 2018.Margit Ruffing - 2020 - Kant Studien 111 (4):647-702.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references