Ought’, ownership and agentive ought: Remarks on the semantic meaning of ‘indexed ought

Studia Philosophiae Christianae 54 (1):25 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.21697/2018.54.1.12

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Ought and agency.Daniel Skibra - 2022 - Synthese 200 (5):1-40.
Ought, Agents and Ambiguity that Matters.Joanna Klimczyk - 2017 - Studia Semiotyczne 31 (2):113-138.
Remarks on Neoplatonism as a synthesis of ancient thought.Tomasz Stepien - 2003 - Studia Philosophiae Christianae 39 (1):196-209.
Can action be normative? Some preliminary remarks.Michał Piekarski - 2018 - Studia Philosophiae Christianae 52 (3):97.
Some remarks on the significance of paradox for science in the context of photometric paradox case.Adam Świeżyński - 2019 - Studia Philosophiae Christianae 54 (4):89.
The Culpable Inability Problem for Synchronic and Diachronic ‘Ought Implies Can’.Alex King - 2019 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 16 (1):50-62.
I—Hannah Ginsborg: Meaning, Understanding and Normativity.Hannah Ginsborg - 2012 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 86 (1):127-146.
Ought.Stephen Finlay - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.
The Janusian Nature of Moral OUGHT.Seyed Yarandi - forthcoming - Erkenntnis.
Causation and the is-ought gap.Terence Rajivan Edward - manuscript

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-21

Downloads
8 (#1,591,922)

6 months
5 (#1,091,584)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references