The pseudodiagnosticity trap: Should participants consider alternative hypotheses?

Thinking and Reasoning 16 (4):332-345 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Logic and Scientific Inquiry. [REVIEW]D. Z. T. - 1969 - Review of Metaphysics 23 (2):344-344.
On Bishops and Donkeys.Nicky Kroll - 2008 - Natural Language Semantics 16 (4):359-372.
The rehabilitation of deductive reasoning.Thomas Bartelborth - 2020 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 35 (2):139-154.
My Life as a Vitamin D Researcher.William B. Grant - 2023 - Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics 3 (4):275-278.
Defeat reconsidered.Jake Chandler - 2013 - Analysis 73 (1):49-51.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-05

Downloads
47 (#499,682)

6 months
5 (#752,882)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?