- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Feyerabend, Galileo and Darwin: How to Make the Best out of What You Have - or Think You Can Get
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 10 (4):285 (1979)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Feyerabend and Galileo: The interaction of theories, and the reinterpretation of experience.Peter K. Machamer - 1973 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 4 (1):1-46.
What you see ain't what you get: more quantum measurement puzzles. [REVIEW]John Forge - 1999 - Metascience 8 (2):267-277.
Introducing philosophy for everyday life: a practical guide.Trevor Curnow - 2012 - London: Icon Books.
Reason, humanity, and the moral law.G. A. Cohen - 1996 - In Christine Marion Korsgaard, The sources of normativity. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 167–188.
How to think like a bat: and 34 other really interesting uses of philosophy.Peter Cave - 2011 - London: Quercus.
Analytics
Added to PP
2010-09-02
Downloads
56 (#401,341)
6 months
10 (#281,857)
2010-09-02
Downloads
56 (#401,341)
6 months
10 (#281,857)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Scientific change: Philosophical models and historical research.Larry Laudan, Arthur Donovan, Rachel Laudan, Peter Barker, Harold Brown, Jarrett Leplin, Paul Thagard & Steve Wykstra - 1986 - Synthese 69 (2):141 - 223.
How Did Darwin Arrive at His Theory? The Secondary Literature to 1982.David R. Oldroyd - 1984 - History of Science 22 (4):325-374.
The importance of historical accuracy in philosophy of science: The case of Curd's conception of copernican rationality.Keith A. Nier - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (3):372-394.
References found in this work
History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions.Imre Lakatos - 1970 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970:91-136.
Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1969 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 69 (1):149 - 186.
Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (I).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):95-123.
Deductive-Nomological vs. Statistical Explanation.G. Hempel, H. Feigl & G. Marxwell - 1967 - Critica 1 (3):120-127.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-58pt2 uwo