Critical and natural sensitivity to base rates

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):27-29 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This commentary discusses three points: (1) The implications of the fact that it is rational to ignore base rates if probabilities are estimated by frequencies from samples without missing data (natural sampling); (2) second order probabilities distributions are a plausible way to model imprecise probabilities; and (3) Bayesian networks represent a normative reference for multi-cue models of probabilistic inference.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Implications of natural sampling in base-rate tasks.Gernot D. Kleiter - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):270-271.
Base rates do not constrain nonprobability judgments.Paul D. Windschitl & Gary L. Wells - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):40-41.
Probabilistic fallacies.Henry E. Kyburg - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):31-31.
Ordinary people do not ignore base rates.Donald Laming - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):272-274.
Base rates and randomness.Ranald R. Macdonald - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):778-778.
Why frequencies are natural.Brian Butterworth - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):259-260.
Pragmatically before ecologically valid tasks.Laura Macchi - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):778-779.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
33 (#692,402)

6 months
5 (#1,067,832)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?