Pindar and Aeschylus [Book Review]

Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 31 (2):297-299 (1956)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

00406457

DOI

10.5840/thought195631227

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,743

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Pindar and Aeschylus.Friedrich Solmsen & John H. Finley - 1957 - American Journal of Philology 78 (4):440.
Theatrical Reenactment in Pindar and Aeschylus by Anna Uhlig.Arum Park - 2020 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 114 (1):103-104.
29. Zu Pindar, Simonides, Aeschylus.Herrn Ad Koch - 1851 - Philologus: Zeitschrift für Antike Literatur Und Ihre Rezeption 6 (1-4):734-736.
Pindar and Aeschylus - John H. Finley: Pindar and Aeschylus. (Martin Classical Lectures, xiv.) Pp. 307. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press (London: Oxford University Press), 1955. Cloth, 36 s. net. [REVIEW]H. J. Rose - 1957 - The Classical Review 7 (01):18-19.
THEMES IN PINDAR AND AESCHYLUS - (A.) Park Reciprocity, Truth, and Gender in Pindar and Aeschylus. Pp. xii + 241. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2023. Cased, US$70. ISBN: 978-0-472-13342-0. Open access. [REVIEW]T. P. A. Roe - 2024 - The Classical Review 74 (1):50-52.
The Odes of Pindar. [REVIEW]Gordon M. Kirkwood - 1947 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 22 (4):711-714.
Aeschylus. [REVIEW]Herbert A. Musurillo - 1954 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 29 (2):297-297.
Aeschylus and Sophocles. [REVIEW]Francis A. Preuss - 1927 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 2 (2):345-348.
Philosophical Themes in G. M. Hopkins.James Collins - 1947 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 22 (1):67-106.
G. K. Chesterton.Elizabeth Sewell - 1955 - Thought: Fordham University Quarterly 30 (4):555-576.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
54 (#439,690)

6 months
5 (#860,126)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references