The Primordial Existence Question and Ockham's Razor

Logique Et Analyse 51 (204):375 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,601

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ockham's Razor.Grant Sterling - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone, Just the Arguments. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 57–58.
Science, God and Ockham’s razor.David H. Glass - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (5):1145-1161.
Do Not Revise Ockham's Razor Without Necessity.Sam Baron & Jonathan Tallant - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (3):596-619.
An Automatic Ockham’s Razor for Bayesians?Gordon Belot - 2018 - Erkenntnis 84 (6):1361-1367.
Ockham's razor and Chatton's anti-razor.Armand Maurer - 1984 - Mediaeval Studies 46 (1):463-475.
Ockham's Razor.Sharon Kaye - 2003 - Think 2 (4):91-95.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-29

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel King
California State University, Northridge

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Quantitative parsimony.Daniel Nolan - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):329-343.

Add more references