How Should One Live?: Comparing Ethics in Ancient China and Greco-Roman Antiquity

De Gruyter (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Chinese and Greco-Roman ethics present highly articulate views on how one should live; both of these traditions remain influential in modern philosophy. The question arises how these traditions can be compared with one another. Comparative ethics is a relatively young discipline; this volume is a major contribution to the field. Fundamental questions about the nature of comparing ethics are treated in two introductory chapters, and core issues in each of the traditions are addressed: harmony, virtue, friendship, knowledge, the relation of ethics to morality, relativism, emotions, being and unity, simplicity and complexity, and prediction.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nursing Ethics: Communities in Dialogue.Rose Mary Volbrecht - 2002 - Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ubuntu, transimmanence and ethics.Anné H. Verhoef & Pertunia Ramolai - 2019 - South African Journal of Philosophy 38 (4):351-362.
Normative Virtue Ethics.Rosalind Hursthouse - 1998 - In Roger Crisp, How Should One Live?: Essays on the Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 19-33.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-10

Downloads
13 (#1,379,444)

6 months
2 (#1,316,056)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Chinese and Western philosophy in dialogue.Ronnie Littlejohn & Qingjun Li - 2021 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (1):10-20.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references