- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Sequential decision making with partially ordered preferences
Artificial Intelligence 175 (7-8):1346-1365 (2011)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Rethinking formal models of partially observable multiagent decision making.Vojtěch Kovařík, Martin Schmid, Neil Burch, Michael Bowling & Viliam Lisý - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence 303 (C):103645.
Rethinking the Foundations of Statistics.Joseph B. Kadane, Mark J. Schervish & Teddy Seidenfeld - 1999 - Cambridge University Press.
Reasoning about partially ordered events.Thomas Dean & Mark Boddy - 1988 - Artificial Intelligence 36 (3):375-399.
Simplified Risk-aware Decision Making with Belief-dependent Rewards in Partially Observable Domains.Andrey Zhitnikov & Vadim Indelman - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence 312 (C):103775.
A unified framework for explanation-based generalization of partially ordered and partially instantiated plans.Subbarao Kambhampati & Smadar Kedar - 1994 - Artificial Intelligence 67 (1):29-70.
Generating diverse plans to handle unknown and partially known user preferences.Tuan Anh Nguyen, Minh Do, Alfonso Emilio Gerevini, Ivan Serina, Biplav Srivastava & Subbarao Kambhampati - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence 190 (C):1-31.
Beyond risk preferences in sequential decision-making: How probability representation, sequential structure and choice perseverance bias optimal search.Christiane Baumann, René Schlegelmilch & Bettina von Helversen - 2025 - Cognition 254 (C):106001.
Ordered binary decision diagrams as knowledge-bases.Takashi Horiyama & Toshihide Ibaraki - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence 136 (2):189-213.
“Guess what I'm doing”: Extending legibility to sequential decision tasks.Miguel Faria, Francisco S. Melo & Ana Paiva - 2024 - Artificial Intelligence 330 (C):104107.
Computing rank dependent utility in graphical models for sequential decision problems.Gildas Jeantet & Olivier Spanjaard - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence 175 (7-8):1366-1389.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-22
Downloads
23 (#999,198)
6 months
13 (#215,339)
2020-12-22
Downloads
23 (#999,198)
6 months
13 (#215,339)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Towards Shutdownable Agents via Stochastic Choice.Elliott Thornley, Alexander Roman, Christos Ziakas, Leyton Ho & Louis Thomson - 2024 - Global Priorities Institute Working Paper.
Desirability foundations of robust rational decision making.Marco Zaffalon & Enrique Miranda - 2018 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 27):6529-6570.
References found in this work
Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior.Itzhak Gilboa & David Schmeidler - 1989 - Journal of Mathematical Economics 18 (2):141–53.
Pragmatic Rationality and Rules.Edward F. Mcclennen - 1997 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (3):210-258.
A contrast between two decision rules for use with (convex) sets of probabilities: Γ-maximin versus e-admissibilty.T. Seidenfeld - 2004 - Synthese 140 (1-2):69 - 88.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-dwqgq uwo