Receptivity to Mystery: Cultivation, Loss, and Scientism

European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (3):51-68 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The cultivation of receptivity to the mystery of reality is a central feature of many religious and philosophical traditions, both Western and Asian. This paper considers two contemporary accounts of receptivity to mystery – those of David E. Cooper and John Cottingham – and considers them in light of the problem of loss of receptivity. I argue that a person may lose their receptivity to mystery by embracing what I call a scientistic stance, and the paper concludes by offering two possible responses to combating that stance and restoring the receptivity to mystery that it occludes.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Mystery and Humility.Ian James Kidd & Guy Bennett-Hunter (eds.) - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion.
Receptivity and judgment.Jennifer Nedelsky - 2011 - Ethics and Global Politics 4 (4):231-254.
Receptivity as a virtue of argumentation.Kathryn J. Norlock - 2013 - Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation 10.
Receptivity and the will.Edward S. Hinchman - 2009 - Noûs 43 (3):395-427.
Receptivity, possibility, and democratic politics.Nikolas Kompridis - 2011 - Ethics and Global Politics 4 (4):255-272.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-12-16

Downloads
611 (#44,412)

6 months
126 (#41,709)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ian James Kidd
Nottingham University

Citations of this work

Sense, mystery and practice.David E. Cooper - 2018 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 79 (4):425-436.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What is Humane Philosophy and Why is it At Risk?John Cottingham - 2009 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 65:233-255.
Religion and the Mystery of Existence.John Cottingham - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (3):15--31.

Add more references