How the relationship between the concept of "Being" and the meaning of "God" in Boethius' theological treatises

Journal of Philosophical Investigations 16 (39):437-452 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The central issue in this article is to understand how is the relationship between the concept of "Being" and the meaning of "God" in Boethius' theological treatises. To this end, four issues are analyzed analytically-descriptively in Theological Treatises; 1. Why did Boethius raise the issue of ontology in Theological Treatises, and what was his purpose in distinguishing between "esse" and "id quod est" in these treatises with a purely Christian and theological nature? 2. The effect of this discussion in explaining God' transcendence through the three attributes "necessity", "perfection" and "to being goodness" of being; 3. The effect of this discussion on God's "creation"; 4. Its effect on God' unity. The study of these cases led to the conclusion that Boethius, by distinguishing between "esse" and "id quod est", considers God to be a simple being in whom "esse" and "id quod est" are one, so being is necessary for Him. God' perfection is also due to His simplicity essence; because He is His own essence and substance, so any quantity and quality that is applied to God will be the carrying of substance. Boethius explains God' simplicity in terms of the originality of being and action, and equates God' being with the Goodness itself, but creatures that are not simple are something else in addition to being good. The Creator and the creature are substantial different, and His Ubiquity goes back to God' substance beyond the two categories of place and time. By distinguishing the abstract number from the concrete number, Boethius believes that the Trinity does not produces plurality, because there is no difference of merit in God and He is nothing but His own essence.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,492

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Estrutura Metafísica do Ser Incriado e dos Seres Criados no de Trinitate de Severino Boécio.Daniela Silveira - 2009 - Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (34):183-195.
Aquinas, Stump, and the Nature of a Simple God.Gaven Kerr - 2016 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 90 (3):441-454.
The Opuscula Sacra.John Marenbon - 2003 - In Boethius. New York: Oxford University Press.
Why Is God Good?Bruce Reichenbach - 1980 - Journal of Religion 60 (1):51-66.
Simplicity and Eternity.Brian Lee Leftow - 1984 - Dissertation, Yale University
On Whether Aquinas’s Ipsum Esse Is “Platonism”.Stephen L. Brock - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 60 (2):269-303.
Divine Simplicity and the Grammar of God-talk: Comments on Hughes, Tapp, and Schärtl.S. J. Otto Muck - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (2):89-104.
Divine Simplicity and the Grammar of God-talk: Comments on Hughes, Tapp, and Schärtl.Otto Muck Sj - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10 (2):89-104.
The Language of Being and the Nature of God in the Aristotelian Tradition.R. E. Houser - 2010 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 84:113-132.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-20

Downloads
17 (#1,250,144)

6 months
3 (#1,176,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references