Liberty to decide on dual use biomedical research: An acknowledged necessity

Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):43-58 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Humanity entered the twenty-first century with revolutionary achievements in biomedical research. At the same time multiple “dual-use” results have been published. The battle against infectious diseases is meeting new challenges, with newly emerging and re-emerging infections. Both natural disaster epidemics, such as SARS, avian influenza, haemorrhagic fevers, XDR and MDR tuberculosis and many others, and the possibility of intentional mis-use, such as letters containing anthrax spores in USA, 2001, have raised awareness of the real threats. Many great men, including Goethe, Spinoza, J.B. Shaw, Fr. Engels, J.F. Kennedy and others, have recognized that liberty is also a responsibility. That is why the liberty to decide now represents an acknowledged necessity: biomedical research should be supported, conducted and published with appropriate measures to prevent potential “dual use”. Biomedical scientists should work according to the ethical principles of their Code of Conduct, an analogue of Hippocrates Oath of doctors; and they should inform government, society and their juniors about the problem. National science consulting boards of experts should be created to prepare guidelines and control the problem at state level. An international board should develop minimum standards to be applicable by each country. Bio-preparedness is considered another key-measure.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,337

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The dilemma of dual use biological research: Polish perspective.Marek Czarkowski - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):99-110.
Biomedical Research with Dual Use: Ethical Concerns.Simona Loana Gheorghiu - 2015 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 6 (1-2):105-112.
Commentary: The Ethics of Dangerous Discovery.Michael J. Selgelid - 2006 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15 (4):444-447.
Dual use opportunity and public health infrastructure.Thomas May - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (4):206-207.
Data Sharing and Dual-Use Issues.Louise Bezuidenhout - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):83-92.
Managing dual use technology: It takes two to tango.Lalit Kant & D. T. Mourya - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):77-83.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
43 (#519,360)

6 months
6 (#861,180)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Dual Use Research: Investigation Across Multiple Science Disciplines.Shannon Oltmann - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (2):327-341.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Essais.Michel de Montaigne - 2007 - Gallimard. Edited by J. Balsamo, C. Magnien-Simonin & M. Magnien.

Add more references