The Main Problem with USC Libertarianism

Philosophical Studies 105 (2):107-127 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Libertarians like Robert Kane believe that indeterminism is necessaryfor free will. They think this in part because they hold both (1) thatmy being the ultimate cause of at least part of myself is necessary forfree will and (2) that indeterminism is necessary for this ``ultimateself-causation''. But seductive and intuitive as this ``USCLibertarianism'' may sound, it is untenable. In the end, nometaphysically coherent (not to mention empirically valid) conception ofultimate self-causation is available. So the basic intuition motivatingthe USC Libertarian is ultimately impossible to fulfill.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
523 (#53,372)

6 months
96 (#64,528)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ken M. Levy
Louisiana State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An Essay on Free Will.Peter van Inwagen - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Significance of Free Will.Robert Kane - 1996 - New York, US: Oxford University Press USA.
Freedom Within Reason.Susan Wolf - 1990 - New York: Oup Usa.
Philosophical Explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Mind 93 (371):450-455.
The impossibility of moral responsibility.Galen Strawson - 1994 - Philosophical Studies 75 (1-2):5-24.

View all 45 references / Add more references