How not to derive 'is' from 'could be': Professor William Rowe on the ontological argument

Philosophical Studies 55 (3):293 - 302 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00355327

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The ontological argument, question-begging, and professor Rowe.William J. Wainwright - 1978 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (4):254 - 257.
Rowe’s new evidential argument from evil: Problems and prospects. [REVIEW]Nick Trakakis - 2006 - Sophia 45 (1):57-77.
Rowe's evidential arguments from evil.Graham Oppy - 2013 - In Justin P. Mcbrayer (ed.), A Companion to the Problem of Evil. Wiley. pp. 49-66.
William L. Rowe: "The Cosmological Argument". [REVIEW]Charles J. Kelly - 1979 - The Thomist 43 (4):686.
William L. Rowe: "The Cosmological Argument" & John J. Shepherd: "Experience, Inference and God". [REVIEW]Brian Davies - 1977 - Religious Studies 13 (1):116-118.
WILLIAM L. ROWE: The Cosmological Argument. [REVIEW]William Lane Craig - 1980 - Studia Leibnitiana 12:290.
On the Argument from Divine Arbitrariness.Peter Forrest - 2012 - Sophia 51 (3):341-349.
On Infinitely Improving Worlds.Michael Almeida - 2005 - Philo 8 (1):38-46.
On Rowe's Argument from Particular Horrors.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2005 - In Kelly Clark (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Religion. Broadview.
Reply to Rowe.Daniel Howard-Snyder & Michael Bergmann - 2003 - In Michael L. Peterson (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Hoboken: Blackwell.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
60 (#356,239)

6 months
9 (#489,609)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ralph Kennedy
Wake Forest University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Anselm and actuality.David K. Lewis - 1970 - Noûs 4 (2):175-188.
The foundations of philosophical semantics.John L. Pollock - 1984 - Princeton University Press. Edited by Lloyd Humberstone.
Indexicality and actuality.Peter van Inwagen - 1980 - Philosophical Review 89 (3):403-426.

Add more references