The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement

In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne, Oxford Studies in Epistemology Volume 1. Oxford University Press UK. pp. 167-196 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Looking back on it, it seems almost incredible that so many equally educated, equally sincere compatriots and contemporaries, all drawing from the same limited stock of evidence, should have reached so many totally different conclusions---and always with complete certainty

Other Versions

reprint Kelly, Thomas (2018) "The epistemic significance of disagreement". In Fantl, Jeremy, McGrath, Matthew, Sosa, Ernest, Contemporary epistemology: an anthology, pp. 167-196: Wiley (2018)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,486

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
15 (#1,293,517)

6 months
14 (#195,031)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Thomas Kelly
Princeton University

Citations of this work

Reflection and disagreement.Adam Elga - 2007 - Noûs 41 (3):478–502.
Belief and Credence: Why the Attitude-Type Matters.Elizabeth Grace Jackson - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (9):2477-2496.
Higher Order Evidence.David Christensen - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81 (1):185–215.
Permissivism, Underdetermination, and Evidence.Elizabeth Jackson & Margaret Greta Turnbull - 2023 - In Maria Lasonen-Aarnio & Clayton Littlejohn, The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Evidence. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 358–370.

View all 284 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references