Response to Bucar and Stalnaker

Journal of Religious Ethics 42 (3):564-570 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This comment provides a brief response to criticisms of Kelsay (2012) set forth in a recent essay by Elizabeth Bucar and Aaron Stalnaker.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comparative Religious Ethics Among the Ruins.Jung Lee - 2014 - Journal of Religious Ethics 42 (3):571-584.
Virtues and Vices of Relativism.Jonathanwyn Schofer - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):709-715.
Letters, Notes, & Comments.Jonathan Wyn Schofer - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):709 - 715.
Comments on six responses to democracy and tradition.Jeffrey Stout - 2005 - Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (4):709-744.
One Good Turn Deserves Another.William A. Barbieri - 2017 - Journal of Religious Ethics 45 (1):194-205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-07-22

Downloads
31 (#734,222)

6 months
3 (#1,481,767)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Religious Ethics and Empirical Ethics.Ross Moret - 2021 - Journal of Religious Ethics 49 (1):33-67.
Exemplarist Environmental Ethics.Alda Balthrop-Lewis - 2019 - Journal of Religious Ethics 47 (3):525-550.
(The Image of) God in All of Us.Laura E. Alexander - 2019 - Journal of Religious Ethics 47 (4):653-678.

Add more citations