On the measurement of criterion noise in signal detection theory: Reply to Benjamin (2013)

, &
Psychological Review 120 (3):727-730 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/a0033141

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,733

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Where is the criterion noise in recognition? (Almost) everyplace you look: Comment on Kellen, Klauer, and Singmann (2012).Aaron S. Benjamin - 2013 - Psychological Review 120 (3):720-726.
On the measurement of criterion noise in signal detection theory: The case of recognition memory.David Kellen, Karl Christoph Klauer & Henrik Singmann - 2012 - Psychological Review 119 (3):457-479.
The belief bias effect is aptly named: A reply to Klauer and Kellen (2011).Chad Dube, Caren M. Rotello & Evan Heit - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (1):155-163.
Signal detection with criterion noise: Applications to recognition memory.Aaron S. Benjamin, Michael Diaz & Serena Wee - 2009 - Psychological Review 116 (1):84-115.
Alleviating the concerns with the SDT approach to reasoning: reply to Singmann and Kellen.Dries Trippas, Michael F. Verde & Simon J. Handley - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Separating decision and encoding noise in signal detection tasks.Carlos Alexander Cabrera, Zhong-Lin Lu & Barbara Anne Dosher - 2015 - Psychological Review 122 (3):429-460.
Information-theoretic signal detection theory.Jacob Feldman - 2021 - Psychological Review 128 (5):976-987.
A variable sensitivity theory of signal detection.Richard C. Atkinson - 1963 - Psychological Review 70 (1):91-106.
Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory.John T. Wixted - 2007 - Psychological Review 114 (1):152-176.
Postscript: Accounting for belief bias in a mental model framework--No problem for whom?Alan Garnham & Jane V. Oakhill - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (2):517-518.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
28 (#791,613)

6 months
4 (#1,238,277)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references