Online Radicalization and Voluntary Belief

Abstract

I discuss voluntary belief in the context of a phenomenon unique to our current political moment: self- brainwashing. Using the very public QAnon movement as a case study, I argue that, although the conditions in which QAnon beliefs are formed is highly similar to those that produce false confessions, the QAnon believer and not the false confessor is morally and epistemically responsible because the former’s beliefs are voluntary: belief is voluntary when the believer has both the capacity and the opportunity to revise their belief. I conclude that this voluntariness is because of the uniquely distributed, Internet-based nature of QAnon.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The Epistemology of QAnon.K. Harris - 2024 - In Luke Ritter (ed.), American Conspiracism. Routledge. pp. 19-33.
QAnon as an Online-Facilitated Cult.Shuki J. Cohen - 2022 - Journal of Religion and Violence 10 (1):37-71.
Choosing to believe.Ronney Mourad - 2008 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 63 (1-3):55-69.
Evangelical Identity and QAnon.Jeremy D. Beauchamp - 2022 - Journal of Religion and Violence 10 (1):17-36.
Holding the Faith True.John Zeis - 2013 - Res Philosophica 90 (2):161-170.
A New Rejection of Doxastic Voluntarism.Sergi Rosell - 2009 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy (3):97-112.
Doxastic voluntarism.Rico Vitz - 2008 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-03-29

Downloads
300 (#91,582)

6 months
45 (#105,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references