Whose Argument Has More Validity, Taubert's or Rojahn's [J]

Modern Philosophy 3:004 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,143

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Validity of the Einstein hole argument.Oliver Davis Johns - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 68:62-70.
Why test animals to treat humans? On the validity of animal models.Cameron Shelley - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (3):292-299.
Xun mi zhe xue zhi lu.Hongsheng Lan, Ya Lin & Shaohong Zhao (eds.) - 1997 - Beijing: Xin hua shu dian jing xiao.
The Validity of Inference and Argument.Dag Prawitz - 2024 - In Thomas Piecha & Kai F. Wehmeier, Peter Schroeder-Heister on Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Springer. pp. 135-160.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
12 (#1,446,073)

6 months
3 (#1,152,291)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references