The Bedside Capacity Assessment Tool: Further Development of a Clinical Tool to Assist with a Growing Aging Population with Increased Healthcare Complexities

Journal of Clinical Ethics 29 (1):43-51 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

BackgroundAs the population of the United States ages, chronic diseases increase and treatment options become technologically more complicated. As such, patients’ autonomy, or the right of patients to accept or refuse a medical treatment, may become a more pressing and complicated issue. This autonomy rests upon a patient’s capacity to make a decision. As more older, cognitively and functionally impaired individuals enter healthcare systems, quality assessments of decision-making capacity must be made. These assessments should be done in a time-efficient manner at a patient’s bedside by the patient’s own physician. Thus, a clinically practical tool to assist in decision-making capacity assessments could help guide physicians in making more accurate judgments.ObjectivesTo create a clinically relevant Bedside Capacity Assessment Tool (BCAT) to help physicians make timely and accurate clinical assessments of a patient’s decision-making capacity for a specific decision.SettingThe Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/northwell.ParticipantsGeriatric medicine fellows, palliative medicine fellows, and internal medicine residents (n = 30).MeasurementsSubjects used the BCAT to assess the decision-making capacity of patients described in 10 written, clinically complex capacity assessment vignettes. Subjects’ conclusions were compared to those of experts.ResultsThe subjects’ and experts’ assessments of capacity had a 76.1 percent rate of agreement, with a range of 50 percent to 100 percent. With removal of three complex outlier vignettes, the agreement rate reached 83.2 percent.ConclusionThe strong correlation between the two groups—one of physicians in training utilizing the BCAT and the other of specialists in this area—suggests that the BCAT may be a useful adjunct for clinicians who assess decision-making capacity in routine practice. The range indicates that further refinement and testing of this tool is necessary. The potential exists for this tool to improve capacity assessment skills for physicians in clinical practice.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Paradox of Consent for Capacity Assessments.Peter Koch - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (4):751-757.
Capacity Reconceptualized: From Assessment Tool to Clinical Intervention.Omar F. Mirza & Jacob M. Appel - 2024 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 33 (1):35-39.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-14

Downloads
14 (#1,273,358)

6 months
6 (#851,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references