I. The “Paradox” of Knowledge and Power

Political Theory 15 (1):5-37 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What if thought freed itself from common sense and decided to think only at the extreme point of its singularity? What if it mischievously practiced the bias of paradox, instead of complacently accepting its citizenship in the doxa? What if it thought difference differentially, instead of searching out the common elements underlying difference?1

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,733

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Rhetoric of the Unsayable.Renate Lachmann - 2024 - In Davor Beganović, Zrinka Božić, Andrea Milanko & Ivana Perica (eds.), Procedures of Resistance: Contents, Positions and the ‘Doings’ of Literary Theory. Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 159-173.
What is ideological bias?Gustavo Caponi - 2023 - Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso 21:65-82.
Carnap, Philosophy and “Politics in its Broadest Sense”.Thomas Uebel - 2012 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 16:133-148.
B-Time Transition.Clifford Williams - 1998 - Philosophical Inquiry 20 (3-4):59-63.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
112 (#189,937)

6 months
13 (#245,997)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Critique and Experience in Foucault.Thomas Lemke - 2011 - Theory, Culture and Society 28 (4):26-48.
Foucault, Rights and Freedom.Ben Golder - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (1):5-21.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references