The Literal/Non-Literal Distinction in Indian Philosophy

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Article lays out the conceptual space for Indian theorizing about literal and non-literal meaning by way of each of these three textual traditions. Since the article’s structure is topical rather than historical, a chronology of major figures is appended to help orient readers. The focus of the article is the period demarcated roughly from 200 CE to 1300 CE, often characterized as the Classical Period of Indian philosophy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,597

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Nature of the Literal/Non-literal Distinction.Martina Blečić - 2014 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 14 (3):357-375.
Nyāya.Matthew R. Dasti - 2012 - The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Literal and metaphorical meaning: in search of a lost distinction.Nicholas Allott & Mark Textor - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
On the Distinction Between Literal and Non-Literal Language.David Ian Sturdee - 1999 - Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
Taking desirelessness () seriously.Christopher G. Framarin - 2005 - Asian Philosophy 15 (2):143 – 155.
Deviance and the literal-metaphorical distinction revisited.Chris Genovesi & Jacob Hesse - 2025 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy:1-25.
Non-literal lies are not exculpatory.Hüseyin Güngör - forthcoming - Philosophical Quarterly.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-23

Downloads
71 (#297,023)

6 months
6 (#873,397)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Malcolm Keating
Smith College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references