Analog and digital representation

Minds and Machines 18 (3):403-408 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I argue for three claims. The first is that the difference between analog and digital representation lies in the format and not the medium of representation. The second is that whether a given system is analog or digital will sometimes depend on facts about the user of that system. The third is that the first two claims are implicit in Haugeland's (1998) account of the distinction.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,061

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
346 (#85,118)

6 months
21 (#132,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Katz
Central Michigan University

References found in this work

Languages of Art.Nelson Goodman - 1968 - Indianapolis,: Hackett Publishing Company.
Languages of Art.Nelson Goodman - 1970 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 3 (1):62-63.
Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind.John Haugeland - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
The Computer And The Brain.John Von Neumann - 1958 - New Haven: Yale University Press.

View all 11 references / Add more references