Taking Heisenberg's Potentia Seriously

International Journal of Quantum Foundations 4 (2):158-172 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is argued that quantum theory is best understood as requiring an ontological duality of res extensa and res potentia, where the latter is understood per Heisenberg’s original proposal, and the former is roughly equivalent to Descartes’ ‘extended substance.’ However, this is not a dualism of mutually exclusive substances in the classical Cartesian sense, and therefore does not inherit the infamous ‘mind-body’ problem. Rather, res potentia and res extensa are proposed as mutually implicative ontological extants that serve to explain the key conceptual challenges of quantum theory; in particular, nonlocality, entanglement, null measurements, and wave function collapse. It is shown that a natural account of these quantum perplexities emerges, along with a need to reassess our usual ontological commitments involving the nature of space and time.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-10

Downloads
377 (#79,360)

6 months
117 (#50,510)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Michael Epperson
California State University, Sacramento

References found in this work

On the Plurality of Worlds.David K. Lewis - 1986 - Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Facing up to the problem of consciousness.David Chalmers - 1995 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (3):200-19.
Facing up to the problem of consciousness.D. J. Chalmers - 1996 - Toward a Science of Consciousness:5-28.
Physics and philosophy: the revolution in modern science.Werner Heisenberg - 1958 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. Edited by Ruth Nanda Anshen.
A case for scientific realism.Ernan McMullin - 1984 - In Jarrett Leplin, Scientific Realism. University of California Press. pp. 8--40.

View all 19 references / Add more references