Ontogenesis, or: If You Want to Study Ontology, Do not Use Ontology

Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):214-216 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Ontology, Reality and Construction in Niklas Luhmann’s Theory” by Krzysztof C. Matuszek. Upshot: Matuszek omits the decisive notions of autology and re-entry in order to construe and subsequently find Luhmann’s ontology. What is more, the whole endeavour to discover ontology in Luhmann’s work is questionable. It misses the point that a systems theory based on operative constructivism is obviously developed for researching ontogenetic processes

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,551

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Reality of Ontologies in Luhmann’s Work.H. Cadenas - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):210-211.
So, What Do You Think About Luhmann’s Ontology?T. Mavrofides - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):211-212.
Searching and Finding Ontology.A. Scholl - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):218-221.
“Believe it or not!” - It’s About the Truth in Science.H. Egner - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):221-222.
Society as Constructed Ontology?F. Grote - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):217-218.
Ontology, Reality and Construction in Niklas Luhmann’s Theory.K. C. Matuszek - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 10 (2):203-210.
What Exists between Realism and Constructivism?A. Nassehi - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):14-15.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-03-16

Downloads
14 (#1,280,710)

6 months
14 (#233,812)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references