The Phenotype as the Level of Selection: Cave Organisms as Model Systems

PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990 (1):151-164 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Selection operates at many levels. Some of the most obvious cases are organismic, such as changes in coloration under the influence of predation (cf. Kettlewell 1973; also Endler 1986). It also operates at other levels. Meiotic drive involves selection for a gene, independently of its effect on the organism. At a higher level, there may also be selection for patterns of colony growth in social insects, again under the influence of predation (cf. Wilson 1971). The appropriate level of selection is a matter of the causal patterns exhibited, or the target of selection. It can also be understood as a question of the appropriate level at which to seek explanatory laws.Robert Brandon (1982, 1990) first clearly distinguished the question of the level of selection from debates over the units of selection. In doing so, he argued that the phenotype is commonly the target of selection, whatever the unit of selection might be.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,880

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Phenotype as the Level of Selection: Cave Organisms as Model Systems.Thomas C. Kane, Robert C. Richardson & Daniel W. Fong - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:151-164.
The Units of Selection and the Structure of the Multi-Level Genome.William C. Wimsatt - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:122 - 183.
The Levels of Selection.Robert N. Brandon - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:315 - 323.
Additivity and the Units of Selection.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:315 - 328.
Levels of selection in Darwin’s Origin of Species.Gordon Chancellor - 2015 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 37 (2):131-157.
Grades of Organization and the Units of Selection Controversy.Robert C. Richardson - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:324 - 340.
Screening-off and the units of selection.Elliott Sober - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (1):142-152.
Group selection: The theory replaces the bogey man.David Sloan Wilson & Elliott Sober - 1994 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (4):639-654.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-30

Downloads
21 (#1,017,991)

6 months
6 (#901,624)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Richardson
University of Cincinnati

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Adaptation and Evolutionary Theory.Robert N. Brandon - 1978 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 9 (3):181.
Force and disposition in evolutionary theory.Elliott Sober - 1984 - In Christopher Hookway (ed.), Minds, Machines And Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Add more references