Positio contra complementum possibilitatis – Kant and Baumgarten on Existence

Kant Studien 107 (2):291-313 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the course of his philosophy, in various contexts, Kant comes to reject three theses about existence: (i) that the thoroughgoing determination of a thing implies its existence, (ii) that existence is a real predicate or determination of a thing, and (iii) that existence is the complement of inner possibility or essence. Kant’s target here is Baumgarten, who advocates these theses as the criterion, classification, and definition of existence. In this article I seek to clarify Kant’s elusive theory of existence through its opposition to Baumgarten. I will show that Kant’s refutation of (i)–(iii) does not stand alone but is grounded on his own definition of existence as (absolute) positing. Thus contrary to common practice, Kant’s negative claims about what existence is not cannot be understood in isolation but must be taken as jointly dependent on Kant’s positive claim of what existence is. I will show that the theses (i)–(iii) fail because they presuppose that existence contributes to the intension or content of a concept, whereas according to Kant existence in fact posits a (non-empty) extension to the concept.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Kant and Frege on existence.Toni Kannisto - 2018 - Synthese (8):01-26.
Rationalism and Kant's Rejection of the Ontological Argument.Dai Heide - 2021 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 59 (4):583-606.
Kant's Argument that Existence is not a Determination.Nicholas F. Stang - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (1):583-626.
Eine grüblerische Argutation? Kant und Hegel zum Sein als Position.Hector Ferreiro - 2016 - In Donev Georgi, Kristeva Silviya, Cholakova Atanaska & Hesse Reinhard, Back to Metaphysics. University Press “Neofit Rilski”. pp. 259-277.
Eine grüblerische Argutation? Kant und Hegel zum Sein als Position.Hector Ferreiro - 2016 - In Donev Georgi, Kristeva Silviya, Cholakova Atanaska & Hesse Reinhard, Back to Metaphysics. University Press “Neofit Rilski”. pp. 259-277.
Baumgarten and Kant on Existence.Courtney D. Fugate - 2018 - In Courtney D. Fugate & John Hymers, Baumgarten and Kant on Metaphysics. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 131-153.
Leibniz and Kant on Possibility and Existence.Ohad Nachtomy - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):953-972.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-01-20

Downloads
1,473 (#11,408)

6 months
184 (#20,316)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Toni Kannisto
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

Kant and Frege on existence.Toni Kannisto - 2018 - Synthese (8):01-26.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Kant on Existence and Modality.Daniel Bonevac - 1982 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 64 (3):289-300.

Add more references