Two liberal fallacies in the hate crimes debate

Law and Philosophy 20 (2):175 - 193 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Two liberal fallacies in the hate crimes debate.M. D. - 2001 - Law and Philosophy 20 (2):175-193.
Why liberals should hate ``hate crime legislation''.Heidi M. Hurd - 2001 - Law and Philosophy 20 (2):215 - 232.
The Words We Love to Hate. [REVIEW]Cynthia A. Stark - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (1):107-114.
Liberal neutrality and liberty of conscience.Walter E. Schaller - 2005 - Law and Philosophy 24 (2):107 - 138.
An attitudinal theory of excuse.Peter Westen - 2005 - Law and Philosophy 25 (3):289-375.
Introduction.Christopher Heath Wellman - 2001 - Law and Philosophy 20 (2):115-120.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
68 (#311,949)

6 months
14 (#237,383)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Dan M. Kahan
Yale University

Citations of this work

Punishing hate and achieving equality.David M. Adams - 2005 - Criminal Justice Ethics 24 (1):19-30.
A feminist liberal approach to hate crime legislation.Amy R. Baehr - 2003 - Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (1):134–152.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Forgiveness and Resentment.Jeffrie G. Murphy - 1982 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7 (1):503-516.

Add more references