Ambiguity of Hope: An Analysis of its Status in Politics

Philosophia 40 (1) (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ambiguity is inherent in the concept of hope especially when used in the field of politics. While a functionalist view of politics can only understand hope in terms of manipulation, an Aristotelian view of politics may require hope for its operation. The ambiguity of hope, then, is traced to ancient Greek and Roman thought, in Hesiod and Ovid. This ambiguity can also be found in 20th century German philosophy. Ernst Bloch is just as enthusiastic about hope as Theodor W. Adorno is skeptical about it. A reflection on their respective philosophies will lead to a better understanding of the potential and the danger of hope in the political field

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,795

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Democratic politics and hope: An Arendtian perspective.Antonin Lacelle-Webster - 2024 - European Journal of Political Theory 23 (4):477-498.
Imaginative Hope.Jakob Huber - forthcoming - Journal of the American Philosophical Association:1-19.
Ultimate Hope Without God: The Atheistic Eschatology of Ernst Bloch.Thomas H. West - 1991 - Peter Lang Incorporated, International Academic Publishers.
What May I Hope? Why It Can Be Rational to Rely on One’s Hope.Döring Sabine - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (3):117--129.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lukas Kaelin
University of Vienna

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references