Nonconceptual content and the "space of reasons"

Philosophical Review 109 (4):483-523 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Mind and World, John McDowell argues against the view that perceptual representation is non-conceptual. The central worry is that this view cannot offer any reasonable account of how perception bears rationally upon belief. I argue that this worry, though sensible, can be met, if we are clear that perceptual representation is, though non-conceptual, still in some sense 'assertoric': Perception, like belief, represents things as being thus and so.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
2,397 (#5,346)

6 months
251 (#12,399)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Kimberly Heck
Brown University

Citations of this work

Perception and the fall from Eden.David J. Chalmers - 2006 - In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne, Perceptual experience. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 49--125.
The Intellectual Given.John Bengson - 2015 - Mind 124 (495):707-760.
What's wrong with Moore's argument?James Pryor - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):349–378.
Perceptual Pluralism.Jake Quilty-Dunn - 2019 - Noûs 54 (4):807-838.
Perceptual Content Defended.Susanna Schellenberg - 2011 - Noûs 45 (4):714 - 750.

View all 225 citations / Add more citations