But the comic situations in writers such as Shakespeare and Chaucer may have forced new understandings of humor. Although some of their humor can be seen as “relief 'there are other kinds of humor as well. Thomas Hobbes introduced what can be called the superiority or disparagement theory of humor. He does not, however, speak approvingly of it” [Book Review]

Southwest Philosophical Studies 25:31 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bibliography.John Morreall - 2009-09-04 - In Dominic McIver Lopes & Berys Gaut (eds.), Comic Relief. Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 160–178.
Superiority in Humor Theory.Sheila Lintott - 2016 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (4):347-358.
Humor and Enlightenment, Part I: The Theory.Peter H. Karlen - 2016 - Contemporary Aesthetics 14 (Article 14).
Humor.Aaron Smuts - 2006 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Comic Relief: A Comprehensive Philosophy of Humor. [REVIEW]John Marmysz - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (3):305-308.
The Applied Philosophy of Humor.Noël Carroll - 2016 - In Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen, Kimberley Brownlee & David Coady (eds.), A Companion to Applied Philosophy. Malden, MA: Wiley. pp. 527–538.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-21

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references