- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Is the no-minimum claim true? Reply to Cullison
Religious Studies 47 (1):125 - 127 (2011)
Abstract
Is the no-minimum claim true? I have argued that it is not. Andrew Cullison contends that my argument fails, since human sentience is variable; while Michael Schrynemakers has contended that the failure is my neglect of vagueness. Both, I argue, are wrongAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
A defence of the no-minimum response to the problem of evil: Andrew cullison.Andrew Cullison - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (1):121-123.
Stipulations and Requirements: Reply to Horden.Louis deRosset - 2017 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 10:74-84.
Metaphysical necessity is not logical necessity.Robert Farrell - 1981 - Philosophical Studies 39 (2):141 - 153.
Reasons, impossibility and efficient steps: reply to Heuer.Bart Streumer - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 151 (1):79 - 86.
Christian Identity and Genuine Openness to the Religious Beliefs of Others.Schubert Miles Ogden - 2005 - Buddhist-Christian Studies 25 (1):21-27.
Objecting to the 'Doesn‘t Justify the Denial of a Defeater‘ Theory of Knowledge: A Reply to Feit and Cullison.Timothy Kirschenheiter - 2022 - Logos and Episteme 13 (4):407-415.
Metalinguistic Agnosticism, Religious Fictionalism and the Reasonable Believer.Jacob Hesse - 2020 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 12 (3):197-202.
Capacities and Counterfactuals: A Reply to Haji and McKenna.Neil Levy - 2012 - Dialectica 66 (4):607-620.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-09-30
Downloads
117 (#183,178)
6 months
20 (#143,265)
2013-09-30
Downloads
117 (#183,178)
6 months
20 (#143,265)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Vagueness and the Problem of Evil: a New Reply to van Inwagen.Luis Oliveira - 2021 - Manuscrito: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 44 (4):49-82.
References found in this work
A defence of the no-minimum response to the problem of evil: Andrew cullison.Andrew Cullison - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (1):121-123.
Vagueness and Pointless Evil.Michael Schrynemakers - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:245-254.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-2jqln uwo